Monday, August 24, 2009

A Cold War Relic Rears its Head and Bears its Fangs

I had a post published on Sojo.net and below is the post with the original title. They changed my titled, which I think their title works better, but I like my title as well.

Being a writer is learning to dance with your own ego, even as your ego steps all over your feet.

A Cold War Relic Rears its Head and Bears its Fangs


I remember playing WWII as a boy. We would pick sides of American and Nazis. Of course, everyone wanted be the Americans, the good guys. The solution became to pretend the team you were on was the Americans and the opponents were the Nazis. We did the same when playing war of Americans vs. Russians. For my team, we were the good guys Americans and they were the bad guys Russians, and for the other team they saw us as bad guy Russians to their good guy Americans. We were children and our play reflected our world.

I am part of the second generation that grew up shaped by the Cold War. When asked in English class to write a poem or story, a good percentage of us would take the theme of nuclear war, fear of radiation, or fear of USSR. The Cold War taught my generation to view the world through good guy/bad guy eyes, seeing the world as Manichean. I have blogged (http://www.life-and-faith.org/2008/11/christian-thought-cold-war-and.html) about this Manichean worldview in our current world. The one of lasting effects of the Cold War is this Manicheanism within our politics, and we are witnessing this in the middle of the health care debate. Recently, Chris Baker, guest hosting on the Glenn Beck show, called President Obama a commie, a secrete commie wanting to control our lives. Mr. Baker was playing out his Manicheanism like an irresponsible child playing a game seeing nothing but evil in President Obama. Good guy/bad guy motif made him blind to the point of a fearful child’s incoherence.

I know that Manicheanism is unchristian and the early Church was right to be distrustful of it. St Augustine, a one time Manichean, became one of its biggest critics. Christian anthropology starts with premise of all humans falling short and being sinners needing God grace. All are offered grace and can be transformed by grace. Our check a balance system was built on this premise. Don’t trust people, as we all are sinners. Best to divide power and go through the messiness of consciences and democracy. Manicheanism does the opposite. It demands trusting right people and mistrusting others. The key is to have the good guys in power and oppose the bad guys when they have power.

The calls to a civil debate about health care have met this good/bad guy motif, and dividing the world into opposing camps. The danger becomes apparent when the question is asked what to do with the opposing side. For the Manichean Democrats, what to do with the evil Republicans? For the Manichean Republicans, what to do with the evil Democrats? Christians are called to be peacemakers, and the beginning with rejecting Manicheanism, rejecting the other, and enter untidiness of loving friend and enemy. President Obama is under pressure to stopping working with Republicans in reforming health care. No matter how hard it may become the road to reform must include working with as many people as possible. There is no other way to live with each other. We must heed St. Paul and become adults and put away childish ways.

4 comments:

VALLE said...

Extremely well said.

Chris said...

As someone with a pacific personality, I agree with the impulse to reconcile opposing sides. It's awfully hard to do, but good to attempt. Peace to you.

Tito Tinajero said...

Thanks Chris and Valle for your comments. Yes, Chris it is hard to love both friend and enemy that is why it was a commandment. Yet, what else can we do?

hailey said...

Very deep insights, you could be a great writer